Sparkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA SPARKMAN, on behalf of No. 2:24-cv-01206-DJC-DMC herself and all others similarly 12 situated, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 COMERICA BANK, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On December 8, 2025, the Court signed an order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (See ECF No. 128.) Defendants filed a notice of appeal the following day. (ECF No. 130.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) requesting that the Court to clarify the restitution amount stated in the Court’s Order. (Mot. (ECF No. 135).) Plaintiff’s Motion also requests that the Court award prejudgment interest under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (Id.) Defendants have opposed this Motion. (Opp’n (ECF No. 140).) The Court grants Plaintiff’s request to clarify the restitution amount. Under Rule 60(a), “[t]he court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found…