Hass

Michael Hass v. Flowers Bakeries Sales of Norcal, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20263:25-cv-06018California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL HASS, Case No. 25-cv-06018-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO CERTIFY

v. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

FLOWERS BAKERIES SALES OF Re: Dkt. No. 34 NORCAL, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 On November 26, 2025, the Court remanded this case to state court. (Dkt. No. 32.) The Court mailed certified copies of the docket and Order to the Humbold Superior Court on December 5, 2025. (Dkt. No. 33.) Nearly two weeks later, Defendant moved to certify the Court’s November 26, 2025 Order for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). (Dkt. No. 34.) After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the January 22, 2026 hearing, and DENIES Defendant’s motion for the reasons set forth below. An order remanding a case to state court is “not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). “Once a district court …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.