Paulina Jesus-Pedro v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202615-73457California485 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAULINA JESUS-PEDRO; P.R., No. 15-73457
Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-798-987
A206-798-988
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 12, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Paulina Jesus-Pedro and her child (collectively, “Jesus-Pedro”)
petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her
appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
the denial of asylum and…