Paulina Jesus-Pedro v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202615-73457California485 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULINA JESUS-PEDRO; P.R., No. 15-73457

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-798-987

A206-798-988

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Paulina Jesus-Pedro and her child (collectively, “Jesus-Pedro”)

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her

appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

the denial of asylum and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.