Oralia Mazariegos-Lopez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202615-73179California942 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORALIA MIGUELINA MAZARIEGOS- No. 15-73179

LOPEZ; YEILI ANALI MAZARIEGOS-

MAZARIEGOS, Agency Nos. A202-075-144

A202-075-145

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Oralia Miguelina Mazariegos-Lopez (“Lead Petitioner”) and her

daughter Yeili Anali Mazariegos-Mazariegos (collectively, “Petitioners”) petition

for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.