Ilnam Oh v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202620-71759California474 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 17 2026
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ILNAM OH, et al., No. 20-71759 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-859-965
A206-859-966
v.
A206-859-967
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 12, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Ilnam Oh is a native of China and a citizen of South Korea.1 He
seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Oh’s wife and minor child derivatively seek relief through his application. For simplicity, we refer exclusively to Oh. application for asylum. We deny his petition.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When “the BIA has
reviewed the…