Ilnam Oh v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202620-71759California474 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 17 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ILNAM OH, et al., No. 20-71759 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-859-965

A206-859-966

v.

A206-859-967

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ilnam Oh is a native of China and a citizen of South Korea.1 He

seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Oh’s wife and minor child derivatively seek relief through his application. For simplicity, we refer exclusively to Oh. application for asylum. We deny his petition.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When “the BIA has

reviewed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.