Guadalupe Ramos Ibarra v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202615-72967California528 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUADALUPE RAMOS IBARRA; et al., No. 15-72967

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-271-790

A206-271-791

v. A206-271-792

A206-271-793

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, A206-271-794

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Guadalupe Ramos Ibarra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Ramos Ibarra’s application for asylum

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.