Danny Tolentino-Pena v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202618-70310California639 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANNY ALEXANDER TOLENTINO- No. 18-70310

PENA,

Agency No. A208-755-314 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Danny Alexander Tolentino-Pena (“Tolentino-Pena”), a native and

citizen of El Salvador, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”) protection. We have jurisdiction to review final orders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.