People v. Richardson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2026D085334California2,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kelety, J.

Filed 2/17/26 P. v. Richardson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF D085334

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SWF024690)

MICHAEL JARED RICHARDSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, John M. Monterosso, Judge. Affirmed. Marilee Marshall for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Charles C. Ragland, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Daniel Rogers and Amanda Lloyd, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Michael Jared Richardson appeals from a judgment entered after

resentencing pursuant to Penal Code sections 1172.1 and 1172.75.1 Richardson asserts the trial court abused its discretion by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.