Artus

Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2026A173068California3,618 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 2/17/26 Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

KAZUKO K. ARTUS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A173068

v. GRAMERCY TOWERS (San Francisco City & County CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Super. Ct. No. CGC-22-601819) Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant, a long-time antagonist of her Condominium Homeowners Association, sued the Association. On the day the case was called for trial, the parties participated in a lengthy settlement conference overseen by the Presiding Judge, at the conclusion of which the parties signed a nine-page “Settlement Agreement” (Settlement Agreement). The settlement required approval by members of the Association; the approval…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.