United States v. Michael Jolly

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202622-50220California3,866 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50220

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00438-MCS-1 v. Central District of California, Los Angeles

MICHAEL JOLLY,

ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BOGGS,* FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

The Memorandum Disposition filed on August 14, 2025, is amended and the

amended Memorandum Disposition is filed concurrently with this order. With this

order, Judges Boggs and Friedland vote to deny Jolly’s petition for panel

rehearing, and Judge Bress votes to grant it. The petition for rehearing is

DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.

* The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.