Suheim Franco Carnalla v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202619-71389California829 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUHEIM FRANCO CARNALLA, No. 19-71389

Petitioner, Agency No. A098-445-471

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

SUHEIM FRANCO CARNALLA, No. 20-70479

Petitioner, Agency No. A098-445-471

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Suheim Franco Carnalla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The first petition

seeks review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to reconsider and motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.