Saul Aranda Hurtado v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202621-70443California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL ARANDA HURTADO, No. 21-70443

Petitioner, Agency No. A088-710-883

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Saul Aranda Hurtado is a native and citizen of Mexico. He petitions for

review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. Although we generally lack jurisdiction to review judgments regarding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cancellation of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), we retain jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.