Thee Aguila v. Baschung CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2026B343822California3,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mori, J.

Filed 2/17/26 Thee Aguila v. Baschung CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THEE AGUILA, INC., B343822

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. 19NWCV00417 v. and 21NWCV00836)

WOLF BASCHUNG,

Defendant and Respondent.

THEE AGUILA, INC.,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

DTLA REAL ESTATE, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Lee W. Tsao, Judge. Affirmed. The Tym Firm and Ronald D. Tym for Plaintiff and Appellant. Zelms Erlich & Lenkov, Rinat Klier Erlich, Brian T. Smith, and Elizabeth A. Macayan for Defendants and Respondents.

____________________________

This appeal involves…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.