Raquel Martinez Cruz v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202617-71066California681 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAQUEL MARTINEZ CRUZ; et al., No. 17-71066

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A202-156-070

A202-156-071

v. A202-156-072

A202-156-073

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent. MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Lead Petitioner Raquel Martinez Cruz and her three children, all natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.