Iris Rapalo-Murcia v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202617-70750California983 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 18 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRIS LIZETH RAPALO-MURCIA; No. 17-70750

BRITTANY LIZETH HERNANDEZ-

RAPALO, Agency Nos. A200-774-847

A206-726-703

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Iris Lizeth Rapalo-Murcia and her minor daughter, both natives and citizens

of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.