Iris Rapalo-Murcia v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202617-70750California983 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 18 2026
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IRIS LIZETH RAPALO-MURCIA; No. 17-70750
BRITTANY LIZETH HERNANDEZ-
RAPALO, Agency Nos. A200-774-847
A206-726-703
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Iris Lizeth Rapalo-Murcia and her minor daughter, both natives and citizens
of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)
decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the…