Hughes

Hughes v. Dejoy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202624-5865California825 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HUGHES, No. 24-5865 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00906-RSL v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BAGGIO, District Judge.***

Michael Hughes appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Amy M. Baggio, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.