Hughes
Hughes v. Dejoy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202624-5865California825 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL HUGHES, No. 24-5865 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00906-RSL v.
MEMORANDUM*
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 10, 2026** Seattle, Washington
Before: PAEZ and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BAGGIO, District Judge.***
Michael Hughes appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in
favor of the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Amy M. Baggio, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. § 1291, and we…