Dominguez-Candelaria

Dominguez-Candelaria v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202625-1042California776 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIX DANIEL DOMINGUEZ- No. 25-1042 CANDELARIA, Agency No.

A204-619-354

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Felix Daniel Dominguez-Candelaria petitions for review of a decision by the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of a decision by the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge (“IJ”) denying cancellation of removal. Because we lack

jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition.

“To be eligible for cancellation of removal . . . ,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.