Dominguez-Candelaria
Dominguez-Candelaria v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202625-1042California776 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FELIX DANIEL DOMINGUEZ- No. 25-1042 CANDELARIA, Agency No.
A204-619-354
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Felix Daniel Dominguez-Candelaria petitions for review of a decision by the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of a decision by the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge (“IJ”) denying cancellation of removal. Because we lack
jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition.
“To be eligible for cancellation of removal . . . ,…