He
He v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202622-816California1,169 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHENLE HE, No. 22-816 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-317-798 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Shenle He, a Chinese citizen, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum. 1 The “substantial evidence”
standard governs our review of the BIA’s decision. See Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d
1173, 1178 (9th Cir. 2007); Iraheta-Martinez v. Garland, 12 F.4th 942, 956 (9th…