He

He v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202622-816California1,169 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHENLE HE, No. 22-816 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-317-798 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Shenle He, a Chinese citizen, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum. 1 The “substantial evidence”

standard governs our review of the BIA’s decision. See Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d

1173, 1178 (9th Cir. 2007); Iraheta-Martinez v. Garland, 12 F.4th 942, 956 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.