Guillermo Zuniga-Lozano v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202620-73614California556 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO ZUNIGA-LOZANO, No. 20-73614

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-059-456

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Zuniga-Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). A due process violation occurs when the proceeding “was so fundamentally

unfair” that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.