Guillermo Zuniga-Lozano v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202620-73614California556 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUILLERMO ZUNIGA-LOZANO, No. 20-73614
Petitioner, Agency No. A096-059-456
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: N.R. SMITH, NGUYEN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Guillermo Zuniga-Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). A due process violation occurs when the proceeding “was so fundamentally
unfair” that a…