Francisco Gamino Corona v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202619-70378California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO GAMINO CORONA; No. 19-70378

MARGARITA SANCHEZ PEREZ,

Agency Nos. A095-450-407 Petitioners, A095-450-408

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Gamino Corona and Margarita Sanchez Perez, a married couple

who are natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) denial of their fifth motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.