Francisco Gamino Corona v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202619-70378California788 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCO GAMINO CORONA; No. 19-70378
MARGARITA SANCHEZ PEREZ,
Agency Nos. A095-450-407 Petitioners, A095-450-408
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Gamino Corona and Margarita Sanchez Perez, a married couple
who are natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (BIA) denial of their fifth motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding…