Esau Medina-Mendoza v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202621-70422California1,022 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESAU MISAEL MEDINA-MENDOZA, No. 21-70422
Petitioner, Agency No. A203-091-311
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted February 4, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Esau Medina Mendoza (“Medina”) seeks review of the agency’s denial of
his motion for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) first rejected Medina’s challenges to
the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) earlier denial of his motions for a continuance and
for the issuance of subpoenas. The BIA then adopted the IJ’s determination that,
despite threats from the Sinaloa Cartel, Medina could safely relocate to areas in
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Mexico outside of the Cartel’s…