Andrea Rojas-Rios v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202618-73380California987 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 18 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA ROJAS-RIOS, CARLY DE No. 18-73380

LEON-ROJAS,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-179-768

A208-179-769

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals*

Submitted February 12, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD JR., District Judge.***

Andrea Rojas-Rios and her minor child, natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stanley Blumenfeld Jr., United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.