Haun
Haun v. Pagano
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/18/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THEODORE HAUN, as Trustee, etc., D084385
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00018288-PR-TR-CTL) KELLY PAGANO et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kevin A. Enright, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of John Murphy, III, John Murphy; Williams Iagmin, Jon R. Williams, and Thomas E. Robertson for Defendants and Appellants. Higgs Fletcher & Mack, John Morris, and Steven M. Brunolli for Plaintiff and Respondent.
The question presented in this appeal is whether an award of attorney’s fees under a unilateral fee-shifting provision, Welfare and Institutions Code
section 15657.5, subdivision (a)1, for a successful financial elder abuse claim
Subsequent undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. was improper because the petitioner in the probate case was also the cross- respondent in an unsuccessful competing claim for elder abuse. Relying primarily on this court’s decision in Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.…