Sanchez

Sanchez v. Hart CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2026D084650California5,060 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 2/18/26 Sanchez v. Hart CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SANCHEZ, D084650

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2016- 00034871-CU-PN-CTL)

HOYT E. HART II,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Katherine A. Bacal, Judge. Affirmed. Hoyt E. Hart II, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Daniel J. Williams and Daniel J. Williams, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Following a bench trial, attorney Hoyt E. Hart II was found to have committed a breach of his fiduciary duties, conversion, and financial elder abuse against a dependent adult while representing George Sanchez and the now-deceased…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.