People v. Raouf CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2026B340815California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanasono, J.

BACKGROUND

On June 23, 2016, a trial court found Raouf guilty of three counts of second degree robbery (§ 211; counts 1, 6, & 7), two counts of resisting an executive officer (§ 69; counts 3 & 13), one count of possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 5), one count of assault with a deadly weapon upon a peace officer (§ 245, subd. (c); count 10); one count of criminal threats (§ 422, subd. (a); count 11), and one misdemeanor count of battery upon a peace officer (§ 243, subd. (b); count 12). The court found allegations true for being personally armed with a firearm as to the robbery convictions in counts 1 and 7. The court found the allegation not true for being personally armed with a firearm for the robbery conviction in count 6. After hearing evidence in the sanity phase of the trial, the court concluded that Raouf was sane at the time he committed the crimes.

All further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. The Delgadillo procedures apply to appeals for orders denying post-conviction relief under section 1172.1. (People v. Rosemond (2025) 108 Cal.App.5th 667, 673.)

2 The trial court found true an alleged prior conviction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.