EFD USA v. Band Pro Film and Digital CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2026B329314California8,185 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanasono, J.

Filed 2/18/26 EFD USA v. Band Pro Film and Digital CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EFD USA, INC., et al., B329314

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC661332) v.

BAND PRO FILM AND DIGITAL

INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from judgment and an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel S. Murphy and Michael Linfield, Judges. Affirmed. Azar Law Group, David E. Azar; Keiter Appellate Law and Mitchell Keiter, for plaintiffs and appellants EFD USA, Inc. and Georgina Teran. Enenstein Pham Glass & Rabbatt, Teri T. Pham and Matthew W. Rosene, for defendants and respondents Band Pro Film & Digital, Inc., Direct Video Warehouse, Inc., and Amnon Band.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.