Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALRADA PRECISION CORP., Case No.: 24-cv-1122-AJB-DEB ORDER Plaintiff, 13 (Doc. Nos. 98, 103, 108, 119, 125) v.

STUART COX,

15 Defendant. Presently pending before the Court are five motions filed by Defendant Stuart Cox (“Defendant”), appearing pro se. (Doc. Nos. 98; 103; 108; 119; 125.) Defendant has filed a motion to vacate the settlement reached at the Early Neutral Evaluation (Doc. No. 98), a supplemental motion to vacate the settlement (Doc. No. 103), a consolidated motion to vacate the settlement (Doc. No. 108), a motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 119), and a motion to reinstate a previously vacated hearing date (Doc. No. 125). The arguments throughout these motions are substantially similar—Defendant moves to vacate the settlement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (see Doc. Nos. 98; 103; 108) and Defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (see Doc. Nos. 103; 108). In…