Maria Casillas-Huaracha v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202614-73993California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ESTHER CASILLAS- No. 14-73993 HUARACHA, AKA Maite, Agency No. A206-409-309 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 3, 2026 Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Maria Casillas-Huaracha, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing an appeal from an

order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying cancellation of removal. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

We review de novo questions of law, including whether the agency violated a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. petitioner’s due process rights and whether a petitioner’s conviction has immigration

consequences.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.