New

New v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202625-319California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROB D. NEW, No. 25-319 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cv-08497-DSF-JPR v.

MEMORANDUM*

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) appeals from the district court’s

order denying its motion to compel Plaintiff Robert New to arbitration. We have

jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16. We review de novo the district court’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to deny a motion to compel arbitration, and for clear error any factual findings

underlying that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.