Hill
Hill v. City of Sacramento
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202624-4185California442 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARNITHA HILL; TIANA No. 24-4185 FIELDS; ANTHONY D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01625-DJC-AC
GRANDERSON; BREJONNA
GRANDERSON; MONTREAL
GRANDERSON; UNIQUE FIELDS, MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; ROBERT
HAMM, Sgt. #3018; DELGADO, Officer #358; BRETT MELLOCH, Officer #602; DEREK CALABRESE, Officer 1005; ERICK NEDELJKOVIC; JOSEPH SWALEH, Officer 900,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.