Bondi
Silva Armenta v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202623-187California558 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TADEO ENRIQUE SILVA ARMENTA, No. 23-187 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-920-942 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Tadeo Enrique Silva Armenta petitions for review of a Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)
denying his application for cancellation of removal. We review that decision for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substantial evidence, Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1005 (9th Cir. 2025),
and we deny the petition.