Bondi

Silva Armenta v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202623-187California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TADEO ENRIQUE SILVA ARMENTA, No. 23-187 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-920-942 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Tadeo Enrique Silva Armenta petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

denying his application for cancellation of removal. We review that decision for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substantial evidence, Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1005 (9th Cir. 2025),

and we deny the petition.

To qualify for cancellation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.