Noot

Noot v. Noot

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202624-5385California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD S. NOOT, Sr., No. 24-5385 D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00155-BLW-DKG Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DAVID NOOT, Sr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Defendant David Noot, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order

granting plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement in this diversity

action alleging breach of contract. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse of discretion. Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131,

1136 (9th Cir. 2002). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.