Noot
Noot v. Noot
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONALD S. NOOT, Sr., No. 24-5385 D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00155-BLW-DKG Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
DAVID NOOT, Sr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Defendant David Noot, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order
granting plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement in this diversity
action alleging breach of contract. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse of discretion. Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131,
1136 (9th Cir. 2002). We…