People v. Deardorf CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 2026C103381California121 words

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (See People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of her right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/s/

MESIWALA, J.

We concur:

/s/ DUARTE, Acting P. J.

/s/

RENNER, J.

3