Martir-Acosta

Martir-Acosta v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202624-5226California992 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALINA ACOSTA MEJIA, No. 24-5211 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-118-378 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

ROXANA MARTIR ACOSTA, No. 24-5225 Petitioner, Agency No.

A208-302-761

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

ISAMAR MARTIR ACOSTA; H.A.M.A., No. 24-5226 Petitioners, Agency Nos.

A208-302-756

v. A208-302-757

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

MARILYN ADANAR JUAREZ-MARTIR,

No. 24-5228 Petitioner, Agency No.

A208-302-762

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.