Rojas-Pino
Rojas-Pino v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-6105California1,295 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUSTAVO ANDRES ROJAS-PINO; No. 24-6105 YENIBED BONILLA-ROCHA; KAREN Agency Nos.
IBETH ROJAS-BONILLA, A246-229-385
A246-229-373
Petitioners,
A246-229-374
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted February 4, 2026 Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Lead Petitioner Gustavo Rojas-Pino and his wife and their minor daughter
(Co-Petitioners) petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (IJ)
denying their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Convention Against Torture (CAT). Because the parties are familiar with the facts,
we do not recount…