Rojas-Pino

Rojas-Pino v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-6105California1,295 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUSTAVO ANDRES ROJAS-PINO; No. 24-6105 YENIBED BONILLA-ROCHA; KAREN Agency Nos.

IBETH ROJAS-BONILLA, A246-229-385

A246-229-373

Petitioners,

A246-229-374

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2026 Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Lead Petitioner Gustavo Rojas-Pino and his wife and their minor daughter

(Co-Petitioners) petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (IJ)

denying their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Convention Against Torture (CAT). Because the parties are familiar with the facts,

we do not recount…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.