Sandoval

Randolph v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-2203California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COLIN M. RANDOLPH, No. 24-2203 D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00968-JLT-BAM Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

C. SANDOVAL; V. BENAVIDES; H.

CARRILLO; R. SPEIDELL, Lieutenant; D.

TYSON; C. PFEIFFER; R. CORLEY; S.

HENDERSON; S. WILSON; M.

HENDERSON; G. MARQUEZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Colin M. Randolph appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1983 action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.