Sandoval
Randolph v. Sandoval
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-2203California281 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
COLIN M. RANDOLPH, No. 24-2203 D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00968-JLT-BAM Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
C. SANDOVAL; V. BENAVIDES; H.
CARRILLO; R. SPEIDELL, Lieutenant; D.
TYSON; C. PFEIFFER; R. CORLEY; S.
HENDERSON; S. WILSON; M.
HENDERSON; G. MARQUEZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Colin M. Randolph appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1983 action…