Hacla
Neway Mengistu v. Hacla
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202623-55382California298 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual, No. 23-55382
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-05427-MWF-PJW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY
OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity; and others to be joined under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Neway Mengistu appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to enforce a settlement agreement in his housing and disability
discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…