Miriam Duran Ortiz v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202619-72530California809 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
MIRIAM KARINA DURAN ORTIZ; No. 19-72530
DILAN FROYLAN LANDA DURAN,
Agency Nos. A208-592-957 Petitioners, A208-592-958
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 12, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD,*** District Judge.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
1 Petitioners Miriam Karina Duran Ortiz and her minor son, Dilan Froylan