Love

Love v. Tri Counties Bank

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-3540California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY LOVE, No. 24-3540 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01761-TLN-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TRI COUNTIES BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Mary Love appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action

alleging federal and state law claims arising from her home equity loan with Tri

Counties Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court order.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.