Horton

Horton v. Gittere

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-765California384 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLEN HORTON II, No. 24-765 D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00280-CLB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM GITTERE; SANDOVAL; TED

HANF; STOLKS; CICILIANO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Carla Baldwin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 18, 2026***

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Allen Horton II appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.