Mayo

Gustafson Feis v. Mayo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-3686California491 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LISA GUSTAFSON FEIS; JULIEN FEIS, No. 24-3686 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:23-cv-00462-MLP v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEITH MAYO, Doctor; SWEDISH FIRST HILL; CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor;

PROLIANCE ORTHOPEDICS & SPORTS

MEDICINE; SWEDISH HEALTH

SERVICES, a Washington nonprofit corporation wholly owned by Providence St. Joseph Health a Washington nonprofit corporation; PROLIANCE SURGEONS, INC., doing business as Proliance Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 18, 2026***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.