Fan

Fan v. City of Newport Beach

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-3866California380 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YAXIAN FAN, No. 24-3866 D.C. No. 8:22-cv-02178-FWS-DFM Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH; ORANGE

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, in the City of Santa Ana; KEITH E. RODENHUIS, KER is the owner of KER Legal Group,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fred W. Slaughter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Yaxian Fan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations arising from state court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). litigation. We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.