People v. Walker CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Delgadillo brief and requests the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified two possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merit of this appeal. 1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to strike any of the strike priors. 2. Whether there were any prison priors (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) remaining in the judgment. We have reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Walker on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.*

WE CONCUR:

IRION, Acting P. J.

KELETY, J.

* Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 4