Naeini
Naeini v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AVA NAEINI, No. 24-5357 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-07118-AB-BFM Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DOES, 1-100, inclusive,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Naeini’s motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to proceed in forma pauperis is
granted.
Ava Naeini appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment confirming an
arbitration award in favor of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation under
the Federal…