Mengistu

Mengistu v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-1099California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEWAY MENGISTU, No. 25-1099 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-05512-MWF- Plaintiff - Appellant, MAA v.

MEMORANDUM*

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY

OF LOS ANGELES; OTHERS TO BE

JOINED UNDER RULE 19 OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Neway Mengistu appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a preliminary injunction in his housing and disability discrimination

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse

of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.