Martin
Martin v. Jensen
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER MARTIN, No. 24-5720 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-04642-VBF-DFM v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAMILA JENSEN Esquire; CHEVON
ROBINSON MARTIN; SAMANTHA
JESSNER, Judge, official capacity; LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT, named as Los Angeles County Probate Department; SCOTT NORD, Commissioner; STEPHEN MORGAN, Judge; EMANUEL THOMAS II Esquire;
DOES, 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Walter Martin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983…