Martin

Martin v. Jensen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-5720California631 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER MARTIN, No. 24-5720 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-04642-VBF-DFM v.

MEMORANDUM*

TAMILA JENSEN Esquire; CHEVON

ROBINSON MARTIN; SAMANTHA

JESSNER, Judge, official capacity; LOS

ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, named as Los Angeles County Probate Department; SCOTT NORD, Commissioner; STEPHEN MORGAN, Judge; EMANUEL THOMAS II Esquire;

DOES, 1-20,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Walter Martin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.