Love
Love v. Tri Counties Bank
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-1876California313 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARY LOVE, No. 25-1876 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01823-TLN-CSK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
TRI COUNTIES BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Mary Love appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action
alleging federal and state law claims arising from her home equity loan with Tri
Counties Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo. Wilson v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1083, 1090 (9th Cir. 2016) (dismissal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Federal Rule of…