Grzeslo

Grzeslo v. Phillips

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202625-1815California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES GRZESLO, No. 25-1815 D.C. No. 1:24-cv-00615-JLT-SAB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

BRYAN D. PHILLIPS; IDALBERTO

ZALDIVAR-GALVES; N. SCAIFE; L.

HASHIMI; ARMENTA TIGGS-BROWN,

P.A.; N. NDU; B HILL; H. SMITH; L.

MORENO; J. WELCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner James Grzeslo appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). law claims. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.