Fayant

Fayant v. U.S. Bancorp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202624-4079California436 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM ROBERT FAYANT; JULIE L. No. 24-4079 FAYANT, D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00095-SAB Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

U.S. BANCORP, doing business as US Bank National Association; GUILD MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, doing business as Cherry Creek Mortgage;

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION; JOHN AND JANE DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley Allen Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2026**

Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

William Robert Fayant and Julie L. Fayant appeal pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.