People v. Utsey CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 2026C100535California6,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/20/26 P. v. Utsey CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100535

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22FE019386)

v.

ELIJAH UTSEY et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Defendants Elijah Utsey and Joshua Emmanuel Berry were found guilty of first degree murder with the enhancement of using a firearm causing death. Defendants make several arguments on appeal: (1) Berry challenges the admission of Utsey’s police interrogation on confrontation grounds; (2) both defendants assert several claims of

1 instructional error; and (3) both defendants challenge the trial court declining to strike their firearm enhancements under Penal Code1 section 1385. We affirm.

FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.